Present: CB, HB, SF, AGA, MG, WH, JBJ, JJ, RdM, YP, FR, TR, RS, FZ, TW.
- Report from meetings
- SLM -> MG
- A US-LARP
BEAM-BEAM 07 workshop will be organized by W. Fischer et al. FZ and OB
contribute to the programme committee.
- The new
salary
grid has been approved. The main differences are the new steps have
been halved and the salary bands
have been extended. All other mechanisms are the same. Transitions
between
salary bands will be probably more difficult with the present scheme.
- Beam behaviour at VELO during powering
failures of
the warm dipoles and quadrupoles -> A. Gomez
Alonso (pdf
file)
- Two
questions have been raised regarding the engineering run with
collisions at 450 GeV: What is the maximum bump amplitude and the
minimum VELO closure.
- Both questions
were considered and possible solutions found. However, some issues for the machine protection
were raised (YP),
triggering studies on failure scenarios around the VELO.
- Simulations include fast failure
scenarios of warm magnets of the
collimation IRs. Other magnets, such as bump compensators, are supposed to be
covered by the machine protection system.
- Distributions
of
5000 particles are simulated in the position of the VELO over
time during the failure.
- For MBXW failure,
the losses appear in collimators;
- For MQW failures
the losses are still somewhere else in the lattice.
- The worse failure
scenario is when the voltage in the power converter of the spectrometer
compensators reaches its
maximum value. Other
failures consider an exponential decay, corresponding to a power supply switched off.
- Hypothetical
losses in the VELO, when a closed orbit is considered: Still losses are
taking place in the collimators
- SF
suggests to study a combination of
quadrupole failure and closed orbit error which may be a worse case
scenario for qualifying the losses. A failure of a single
quadrupole (Q4 or Q5) may give also quite
- YP suggests to do failure
studies for the compensators as they are bipolar (need of FMCM)
- WH
suggests to remove the crossing
angle from the simulations, as it would be the case during the
engineering run.
- In conclusion, the VELO becomes
an aperture limitation only if it is closed with injection optics, but
most of the losses are covered by the collimators
- Collimators
are
considered as black absorbers and the simulations do not include any
scattered particles. A code modification
has to be implemented in order to record all losses in case of changing
magnetic field
- Simulation of a real dynamic
magnet change in MADX is elaborated by HB and AK
- Presentation of the new Group structure -> MG
- The RLC section is split in one
section for CLIC and CTF3 under Hans Braun and the rest of the staff
are moved to LOC section which becomes the LHC Commissioning and Upgrade
section. Elias Metral contributes in this section but his main activity
are LHC injectors (SPS supervisor).
- YP moves to LHC
Injectors section as he is a PS supervisor and works on PS2 and JBJ
moves to the CLIC section.
- AOB
Colour code:
- Black: proposed agenda
- Red: outcome of discussion at the meeting
Last update:
08-Feb-07
MG & YP
Back to LOC Minutes